Paul Mullen | Source: TMI http://bit.ly/o3yzl8
The TBH RCI and Nazri adopts and quotes Mullen’s report in an attempt to justify the finding of “driven suicide”.
Marcus van Geyzel calls the TBH RCI a sham and a shame.
Who is telling the truth?
Now, you decide.
Download and read Mullen’s report here.
Tags: LoyarBocor, Paul Mullen, RCI, TBH, Teoh Beng Hock
No lies. Only leaks.
Posted on 25 July 2011.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
Read more articles posted by LoyarBocor.
It is hitting me that google play gift cards are highly paid for get premium app from the google play store.
It's quite clear that Mullen's report doesn't say what the RCI thinks it does.
But on a tangent, objectively speaking as a lawyer who has retained psychs on quite a few occasions, I would be embarassed to tender a report of that quality in open court!
I read Mullens report and he succinctly gave his opinion in para 26, 28 and 31 that there was very little likelihood that TBH had committed suicide; he was in the low risk group.
IMHO RCI does not understand Queen's english. Nazri? He is just a half-past six lawyer and was only capable to sign SPA prepared by his clerks. No wonder the nosense that usually comes out of his mouth.
What is the main motivation of the Bar Council and Malaysian Bar when issuing statements or taking action?
LoyarBurok - An online journal owned by Liberal Banter Sdn Bhd (Company No. 723502-K) Creative Commons licence to posts | Full copyright in name and logo | *Please internalise our "Read this first!" carefully