For REFSA, Internal Party Disagreements are Like Ginseng
Guest contributor, Ong Kar Jin, thinks internal party disagreements are actually good.
Guest contributor, Ong Kar Jin, thinks internal party disagreements are actually good.
Observations of a Kenyan student in Malaysia on the country – a beautiful nation with beautiful people who live with a stinking political system, institutional rot, and the trouble with the Malay leadership.
Observations of a Kenyan student in Malaysia on the country – a beautiful nation with beautiful people who live with a stinking political system devoid of human good, and the trouble with the Malay leadership.
![[UPDATED] Q&A with Dr.M: Politicians and Humility, myth or non-existent?](https://www.loyarburok.com/wp-content/themes/Newspro/timthumb.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Floyarburok.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F05%2FImage0077-327x400.jpg&q=90&w=140&h=78&zc=1)
(Updated with closing paragraph previously omitted due to technical error on our part) Reflections after a chance Q&A session with Dr. Mahathir – on his support for Perkasa, the 1988 Judicial Crisis, and other inconsistencies between what he claims now and what he had allowed to take place during his tenure as Prime Minister.
That is what PERKASA means to me and the tubby lard-o who leads it can fuck his little stubbie in his racist gumbo pie. (Please be advised that profanity is used in the article. Lab tests have shown that no animals or children would suffer any physical injuries as a result of being exposed to it.)
LoyarBurok is pleased to reproduce this tat-to-tit response to Dr. Mahathir’s “Kaki Dalam Kasut” written in July 2009 when he brandishes the disgraceful rhetoric that Perkasa uses to intimidate the non-Malay population.
A deliberation on whether Matthias Chang was a victim of judicial oppression through an examination of the law of contempt; from its coming to being to its evolution to what it is today and how it applies to Matthias Chang’s unruly behaviour in court – in 2 parts.
A deliberation on whether Matthias Chang was a victim of judicial oppression through an examination of the law of contempt; from its coming to being to its evolution to what it is today and how it applies to Matthias Chang’s unruly behaviour in court – in 2 parts.
Recent Comments