The Transgender Case: A Summary

A summary of the recent decision in the transgender case, and some of the submissions by the various lawyers.

UPDATED (15 October 2015): The decision of the Federal Court allowing the government’s appeal on a preliminary issue is now out, and is found at the end of the article.

The three Respondent Muslim Transgenders were living in the State of Negeri Sembilan. Each of them had the confirmed medical condition called ‘Gender Identity Disorder’ (GID), which led to their expressing themselves as women by wearing women’s clothes and make-up in public. The medical evidence established that the said medical condition is something that the Transgenders did not choose and cannot change.

Section 66 of the Syariah Criminal Enactment 1992 (Negeri Sembilan) provided that:-

“Any male person who, in any public place wears a woman’s attire or poses as a woman shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding one thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both.”

Since the provision made no exception for those with GID, the Transgenders were repeatedly detained, arrested and prosecuted for wearing women’s attire or posing as a woman by the religious authorities of Negeri Sembilan.

They therefore applied to the High Court of Seremban for a declaration by way of judicial review that s66 was void by reason of being inconsistent with arts 5(1) (life and personal liberty), 8(1) (equality), (2) (gender discrimination), 9(2) (freedom of movement) and 10(1)(a) (freedom of speech, assembly and association) of the Constitution.

Whilst leave to apply for judicial review was granted, the substantive application was heard by another judge who dismissed the application, holding that the behaviour of the Transgenders was likely to lead to homosexual relationships and therefore a heightened threat of HIV/AIDS, so that the effect of s66 was to prevent a greater harm to society and which benefit outweighed the constitutional rights of the Transgenders.

The Transgenders subsequently appealed against the High Court’s decision to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal heard the parties for two days. They were made aware of the June 2014 arrest of 16 Transgender guests and Mak Andam (bridal make-up artist) at a Malay wedding in Bahau, Negeri Sembilan pursuant to s66. The Court of Appeal reserved its decision, and then unanimously held that s66 was inconsistent with articles 5(1), 8(1)–(2), 9(2) and 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution and was therefore void. [Click here for the summary of the decision and full judgement here.]

Most in the transgender community, and right thinking members of civil society in Malaysia, rejoiced.

In January 2015, the Federal Court granted leave to the State Government of Negeri Sembilan to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision, and granted leave to the Islamic Religious Council of Negeri Sembilan (Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Sembilan) to intervene in the appeal. The Federal Court framed the following questions for determination:-

“Whether section 66 of the Syariah Criminal Enactment 1992 (Enactment 4 of 1992) of Negeri Sembilan contravenes articles 5(1), 8(1), 8(2), 9(2) and 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution.”

The submissions by the lawyers for the substantive appeal were as follows:-

– Submissions of lawyers for Negeri Sembilan – Part 1 and Part 2

– Submissions of the lawyers for the Transgenders, Aston Paiva and Fahri Azzat, are here

On 13 August 2015, the first day of hearing in the Federal Court, the State Government of Negeri Sembilan raised two preliminary objections:-

i) That the Transgenders should have obtained leave of a single Federal Court judge to commence their constitutional challenge, under article 4(4) of the Constitution; and

ii) That the Transgenders should have concluded their Syariah court proceedings under s66 first before instituting their claim for judicial review.

The Federal Court also expressed concern:-

iii) Whether judicial review was the appropriate procedure.

The Trangenders’ reply:-

i) Their challenge is whether s66 is inconsistent with their guaranteed constitutional rights, and not whether the State Government had the competency to make the s66. Only the latter challenge requires leave of the Federal Court;

ii) Violations of constitutional rights may occur not only when a citizen is prosecuted under an allegedly unconstitutional law, but also when a person is arrested, detained or charged under an allegedly unconstitutional law. The effects of a law can be felt without a prosecution, and to insist that a citizen needs to face a prosecution under the law in question before he can challenge its constitutionality could have the perverse effect of encouraging criminal behaviour to test constitutional issues; and

iii) The specific instances of the Transgenders’ arrest, detention and prosecution show that s66 is being enforced against them i.e. they are adversely affected by the enforcement of s66. For the Federal Court to, at this stage, decide that judicial review is not the appropriate procedure would, in effect, be a setting aside of the order granting leave for judicial review in November 2011; in contravention  of O. 53 r 9, RC 2012.

Their lawyers filed written points of clarification which are here.

The matter was fixed for Decision/Judgment on 8th October 2015 at the Federal Court in Putrajaya. The Federal Court allowed the appeal on the preliminary objection, and said that the Transgenders’ ought to have gone directly to the Federal Court.

UPDATED (15 October 2015): The decision of the Federal Court is here.


Justice for Sisters has published a Media Guide for reporting this case, which can be found in BM here. A general media guide for reporting issues relating to transgenders is here.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The collective persona of Lord Bobo's minions (yes, all the cheeky monkeys and monkettes). Haven't you heard? LoyarBurokking is a lifestyle. Join us, and your life will never be the same again. Because it's fun.

Posted on 9 October 2015. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by .

Read this first: LB Terms of Use

6 Responses to The Transgender Case: A Summary

  1. Rahmat

    WEALTHY SUGAR MUMMY AND DADDY!!! whatsapp +601126122938 Do you wish to make EXTRA INCOME above RM8,000 per day? Get paid for your service, we offer sugar mummy/Daddy/Gay/ +601126122938,Lesbian all over Malaysia/Singapore.
    BOOST YOUR INCOME!!! Welcome to Malaysia/Singapore finest, reliable dating agency with good track records. We have a wonderful influential network of clients ranging from government officials, politicians, executive, MP's, oil barons, money bag business personality, hotel owners and gold men and women, and we have very influential connected sugar Mummies/Daddies, Gay and Lesbian all over Malaysia/Singapore. Be among the people to get our exclusive connections. We are the best reliable, efficient in our job, get the opportunity to meet them (whats-app+601126122938) now to get connected within 2 hours . We have sugar mummies all over Malaysia/Singapore who are willing to lavish money on you, with gifts, cars, house and even contracts connections, and even assist you get a job, enter the entertainment industry and fashion industry, and also assist in getting loans, and financial assistance.what they need is sexual satisfaction and they pay for the services (whats-app No:+601126122938) payment from RM6,000 TO RM8,000 PER-NIGHT NOTE:APPLICANT MUST BE ABOVE 17YRS OLD (whatsaapp +601126122938) for urgent hook up… in Malaysia and singapore in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

  2. o so nice article…..tanks

  3. Ms Putri

    Hookup Agency..
    Whatsapp Contact : +60166482709
    Do you wish to make above RM4,000 per day?..Are you tired of getting little income?.Do you have all it takes to make a lady happy in bed?… here is the only opportunity to get rich and make cool cash with one of the richest sugar mummy in Malaysia and Singapore whatsapp (+60166482709) and get hook up immediately.
    We have different sugar mummy of all class who are ready to pay as much as 4,000rm per night. Please Note what they need is sexual satisfaction and they pay for the services, we offer sugar mummy/daddy/gay/ lesbian all over Malaysia and Singapore.These ladies are divorced and single ladies there is no risk involve we have per-time services and long-terms hookup terms hookup.applicant can make above RM30,000 Per month. sugar mummy and daddy have change the life of many young boys and girls. In Malaysia / Singapore mummy pay you rm4,000 each time you meet her, our hookup venture in 100% legal risk free. We are one true legitimate agency in Malaysia / Singapore for an urgent hookup. contact agent putri via whatsapp (+60166482709) And get connected now

  4. This is indeed a good way to comply your guidelines with such kind of the instruments and guidelines which are indeed considered to be so well, this will further bring some more value to it.

  5. Sarina Gesell

    Nice to see this article.