Bar 69th AGM, 14 March: Group Practice motion filed

On 6 March 2015, a motion regarding the Bar Council’s proposed Group Practice rules was filed. It is due to be debated at the upcoming Malaysian Bar’s 69th AGM to be held on 14 March 2015.

The profession is being liberalised around the world. Foreign law firms and lawyers have been allowed in to practise. Alternative business structures of accountants, auditors and lawyers are possible in other countries.

However, our regulations on lawyers are antiquated and most, irrelevant in the face of global disruption to the traditional law firm model.

The Group Practice model proposed by the Council offers an important option for small firms which make up about 90% of the profession. These firms should be empowered with maximum flexibility to pool their resources, and develop their capabilities and competitive edge to meet rising costs. Singapore and Hong Kong have successfully implemented the Group Practice model with far fewer restrictions.

Looking forward, the Bar Council should be seen more as an ‘enabler’ rather than only as a ‘prohibitor’. The proposed Group Practice rules must be enacted in the spirit of the former.

Tags: , , , , , ,


Life's a sufferance. Lawyering a bore. As Edmund continues various escape techniques to be rid of Lord Bobo’s influence, he crusades with UndiMsia! movers to build strange youth love movements around the country. And so he tweets @edmundbon and practises the black magic art of advocacy at www.BONadvocates.com

Posted on 7 March 2015. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by .

Read this first: LB Terms of Use

2 Responses to Bar 69th AGM, 14 March: Group Practice motion filed

  1. Edmund Bon Tai Soon

    Update on how it went at the AGM on the 14th of March:

    When our motion was called up, we were informed by the Chair that BC decided to reconsider the Rules in light of models in other countries. Small Firms Committee has been tasked with this.

    BC therefore agreed with our resolution 1 and the Chair proposed an amendment to it which I accepted. I dropped resolution 2 as it was not necessary for the moment.

    We got what we sought. There was no need to put it to the vote. The motion was not withdrawn. BC adopted the amended resolution.

    Net effect is that there will be a re-consideration and the lobbying of BC members to have better Rules will start.

    Appreciate BC's decision to agree with the thrust of what we wanted in the motion. The hard work begins, again.

  2. it is unfoRTUNATE THAT THE GOVERNMENT TREATS THE BAR S AN OPPOSITION PARTY; WHEN WILL THE DAY COME IT OPENS ITS EYES.