Edmund Bon’s 112 Statement to the Police

ASP Zaidi A. Rahman from the Kepala Batas police station took Edmund’s statement today at about 11.30am. Edmund’s lawyers, Amer Hamzah Arshad and New Sin Yew with pupil-in-chambers, Lee Shee Pin was present at the recording session.

Pic by Siow Feng Saw || Malay Mail Online

Here is a briefer on the session today:

Report no. 512/14, Kepala Batas police station

The statement was recorded under section 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Edmund’s statement was classified as a witness’ statement, and not as a complainant’s or suspect’s statement. After the introductory formalities such as Edmund’s background (including whether he was married or not), the gist of Edmund’s reply is here which was thereafter attached to the official 112 witness statement to form part of it.

In essence, Edmund said that the words complained about were not seditious. He relied on a Federal Court decision – where he appeared as co-counsel – to state the legal position on the non-applicability of religious opinions (fatwa) to non-Muslims.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Posts by

SYNew is a humourist who is currently practicing law. Unfortunately for him, not everyone appreciates humour, especially judges. He suffers from a bad case of cacoethes scribendi and he is here to relief his itch. Trying to tweet @S_Y_New

Posted on 20 September 2014. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by .

Read this first: LB Terms of Use

One Response to Edmund Bon’s 112 Statement to the Police

  1. arslan672

    Could possibly positive side due to this breed; like we have a good side on your awful earliest kiss. You still planned to day Jennifer or perhaps Robbie while they weren’t the perfect kisser, accurate? They however had many positive qualities as well as American Fluff dog will probably too! http://www.fashiondelights.net