#Fellatio: A Writer’s Freedom of Expression and Sexism

Animah Kosai‘s interpretation of the Ask Lord Bobo fellatio issue, and where she thinks we should go from here.

Over the past two weeks over Twitter, I have become aware of a battle raging over an Ask Lord Bobo article published on The Malaysian Insider shortly before Christmas addressing a woman — “What to get your man for Christmas”.

When I read the article, I was amused and dismissed it as the usual type of joke many of my guy friends tend to e-mail us. Yes, I am amused at sexual jokes and laugh at them along with my guy friends. But I do know that not everyone can take these jokes in the same way.

There are articles published all over the place which will offend someone. Whether it is some makcik in Alor Setar, a gay person in PJ, a politician — someone will be offended. A writer cannot be expected to have every kind of person peering over his shoulder as he writes. I write. My own inner censor is loud enough, do I want someone else telling me what I can and cannot write?

Yes, I want freedom of expression. I will fight for freedom of expression. Many of my friends are writers and I have had to comfort those who have had threats against them because they dare to write what others only feel but keep hidden.

What a writer writes and publishes for the world to see, defines him. Awareness of that will keep a writer aligned to what he stands for. If I were to write a sexual satire which goes viral, then that is what I will be known for. If I write about human rights and fight for the oppressed, then that is what I will be known for. We all know and expect what Farish Noor will write about. We all know and expect what Haris Ibrahim will write about. We were all shocked when Raja Petra’s conduct ran contrary to what he had written about for many years.

A writer will stand for something. Many of us have the highest respect for LoyarBurok as it is so clear that they stand up to fight and create awareness on many human rights issues including gender rights. So when Lord Bobo, being a figurehead of LoyarBurok is depicted as answering a woman in a manner which has been seen as portraying her as a sex object, it shocked many women, including LoyarBurok supporters. Of all “people”, Lord Bobo is sexist?

Yes, I said I dismissed it as a joke. I can take it from a friend. But this was coming from the mouthpiece of LoyarBurok who has a strong brand as a champion of the downtrodden. It would have been different if LoyarBurok merely published a piece written by an individual. In that case, to defend an individual’s freedom of expression makes sense. What has happened here is that the strong brand of LoyarBurok is now perceived as sexist. I don’t consider the people behind LoyarBurok as sexist. They are incredibly committed and hardworking for the cause. But some people are beginning to perceive LoyarBurok, and with one broadbrush their various entities as sexist — and therein the problem lies.

Sexism is a serious problem in Malaysia, and one that is not fully appreciated.

Women in Malaysia encounter sexism every day. A comment such as, “oh, you’re a woman, are you sure you can handle it?” to the portrayal of women as helpless whining humans in advertisements are sexist. In fact we are so used to women being portrayed in a lesser and disempowering manner, that it has become deeply embedded in our psyche. We do not recognize sexism when it stares us in the face. Even women. I did not initially recognise the sexism in the Lord Bobo article. It is sexist because it assumed a woman to be a mere sexual object whose existence it was to please a man (it would have been okay if it had been balanced to show that the man too was a sexual object designed to please a woman, but it was one way). And you know why I didn’t realise it? Because we women are portrayed so widely in that manner that we have come to believe it as true.

And this is why more and more women are stepping up to fight sexism.

We have been disempowered for centuries. Despite forming half of the world population, there are less than 10% of us on the Boards of Fortune 200 companies, as political leaders. In Malaysia, the figures are deplorable. Less than 8% of women are in parliament with a miserable 3% in Cabinet.

We need to stop believing that we are the lesser gender. We cannot rise and fulfill our own dreams if we fall for perpetuated stereotype of helplessness. The media, TV dramas, films (local and abroad), schools (and their textbooks), parents, governments all contribute, often unconsciously, to women’s disempowerment.

Jokes, no matter how innocent, such as the Lord Bobo satire inadvertently lends itself to the stereotype. I am sure the writer did not think, “Aha, how shall I bring women down today? I shall write a satire about her being a sexual object.”  Of course not. But he (or she) is still in that women stereotype stupor so many of us are in.

Until women are fully emancipated (in the way men are) and don’t buy into that stereotype, sexist jokes are going to continue being a problem.

What alarmed me more than the Lord Bobo article was the battle on Twitter. Some women spoke against the article. That is fine. Some people defended the article. That is also fine. Freedom of expression respects all points of view. What is not acceptable in my view are the many tweets which attempt to shut up the women who spoke against the article. Some were merely “it was a joke, you have no sense of humourlah” type tweets which on the face of it seems innocuous enough but can be deeply damaging. The “it was a joke, you have no sense of humourlah” type retort can be found in AWAM’s educational sexual harassment video. In it a man uses it to brush off a woman who has stood up to him against sexual harassment. This leaves her doubting her own feelings of hurt and she begins to question whether she is to blame. In other words he has just denied her, her own feelings. Her natural reaction is to feel she was wrong in raising it, despite her feelings which she can’t quite explain. So the next time it happens, she will still feel hurt but keep quiet. This is disempowerment.

This needs to change. We should welcome public discourse and different viewpoints. But we should also strive to make it comfortable so that women feel safe to speak up without retaliation, humiliation or dismissal.

I know most of the men did not intend to shut them up (at least I hope they didn’t), but when women witness these hard debates going on, they would rather stay away, keep the peace and allow the misogyny to remain.

I am a firm LoyarBurok supporter and offer them my services from time to time because I believe in LoyarBurok’s cause, and the people with them are my friends. I don’t believe in banning Lord Bobo or staying away from the excellent programmes LoyarBurok continues to deliver.

What Lord Bobo has done, perhaps unwittingly, is opened the pandora’s box to an issue that has long laid dormant but been a fundamental feature of Malaysian life — Sexism. So let’s talk about it.

Animah Kosai is a lawyer, a coach for Sekolah Aktivisme (one of LoyarBurok’s initiatives) and a co-founder of Surya Women.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


The collective persona of Lord Bobo's minions (yes, all the cheeky monkeys and monkettes). Haven't you heard? LoyarBurokking is a lifestyle. Join us, and your life will never be the same again. Because it's fun.

Posted on 6 February 2014. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by .

Read this first: LB Terms of Use

4 Responses to #Fellatio: A Writer’s Freedom of Expression and Sexism

  1. amira nabil

    Animah… she herself been harrasing quite a lot of employees currently. She doesnt walk the talk… most of us at work think she's just an old woman w full of shit.

  2. flyer168

    Just to share this…
    http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jun

    You be the judge.

    Shalom.

  3. Apple

    This article makes reference to the stereotypical man whose mind is said to be always preoccupied with sex. Fellatio is a rather one-sided sex act, and the joke here is based on the idea that men love it because they are only concerned with their own sexual gratification and have no regard for their partner's. Lord Bobo was making fun of men by inferring that they are extremely self-absorbed and obsessed with sex. Repetition of "fellatio" throughout the article was intended to reflect the supposedly typical man's state of mind: ask a man a simple question like "what to get for Christmas" and all you will get is "fellatio fellatio fellatio" because that's the only thing he ever thinks about all of the time. Parody takes a situation and exaggerates it to get a ridiculously over-the-top comic effect.

    The joke fell flat mainly because it does not take into account the audience's vastly different perceptions towards fellatio. Another reason the joke didn't quite work lies in its narration- certain things could have been made clearer to the reader.
    I have to say I don't see the alleged sexism against women here. Technically it is sexist against men, for it assumes a false stereotype of men, which is of course the whole point of the joke. I hope the red mist now clears for some.

    I won't go into the issue of free speech here and will instead say this to Lord Bobo- having an online platform with a large readership allows us to connect and engage with people whom we would otherwise not have the opportunity to. It's the chance to develop a robust civil society. If the result of an article is aggro about a topic like fellatio, has anything constructive been achieved?
    We tend to surround ourselves with ppl of the same wavelength who yes, will get our jokes, but the likelihood is they already share similar social, political, economic etc etc views. Getting someone from a different walk of life to see our point of view on an issue that really makes a difference is when the magic happens. Ideally no topic should be taboo and so to ensure continual constructive dialogue, sensitivity management and diplomacy will go a long way.

    We all need to ask ourselves this – do we find offense in situations where there is actually no cause for if we were to pause and reflect on whether that offense is real or merely perceived? Unfortunately this is getting harder and harder to do in the world we now live in, but we need to give each other the benefit of the doubt, otherwise we get conflict, anger and victimhood, and none of the good stuff like harmony, tolerance and an empowered society.

    In short: frat boy up humour, wrong time and place, not sexist and definitely not ill-intentioned. The last bit, I am sure you will all agree, is the most important.

    So let's go easy on Lord Bobo. He with his irrepressible spirit of daring greatly, which is the very attribute that leads him in his headlong pursuit (pardon the pun) in championing innumerable social causes which, many of the more jaded among us sit back and dismiss as futile or irrelevant. The downside unfortunately, is that he erm, can get carried away with his rather goofy sense of humor. Oh, and that he might need to brush up on his PR skills a little. I just put it down to the fact that he is in fact after all, only male. Oops! Sexist joke there….. tsk!!!

  4. curious

    Animah, I thought giving and receiving blowjob is illegal in Malaysia. Why is Bobo telling her to commit 'crime'? Let say if she gets charged or whatever, Bobo should also be liable for instigating and abetting her right? Please answer.