Malaysia: All Real Estate, No Fourth Estate

A response to Panglima Garang’s article titled, ‘Malaysia, a land of no growth’ and a consideration of the role of the media in a democracy.

Given that the BN lost the popular vote in Peninsular Malaysia in the last general elections one may reasonably surmise that the frustration amongst Malaysians with the direction of our beloved country is fairly widespread. But what are the common factors that fuel this frustration felt by a large proportion of Malaysians?

I sense a great deal of uncertainty over this very crucial question. It is as a direct result of this uncertainty that we are witnessing the more extremist elements of our society and political culture rearing their ugly heads.

If we take the view that the majority of Malaysians are in favour of a more moderate, equitable society then perhaps if there was a clearer idea of what the Malaysian public as a whole broadly thought and felt on a range of “sensitive” issues, the bigots and religious extremists in our midsts would for the sake of their own political survival feel obliged to tone down their language and behaviour. Similarly, the more progressive elements would be emboldened.

So what are the barometers of Malaysian public opinion? In most democratic societies it is the media that plays this role. That is why it is sometimes known as the ‘fourth arm of government’ or the Fourth Estate following from the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary.

Do we see the Malaysian media playing the rightful role that it should if Malaysia is a true democracy? Do we see the mainstream newspapers robustly debating the issues of the day? Do we see politicians from the various sides of the political spectrum engaging in debates through the media? Do we see these politicians engaging through the media with the Malaysian people whom they claim to represent? Do we see the Malaysian media educating the Malaysian people about the most important issues that affect our country by providing unbiased coverage?

No, we do not.

The people are left with two starkly contrasting choices: blogs and other online media which taken as a whole are often perceived as anti-government and the mainstream media which handles the government with kid gloves and is by default and by reason of ownership seen as the mouthpieces of the government. Is it any wonder that it is difficult to gauge public sentiment in this environment? Is it any wonder that in this state of confusion and disarray that the more nefarious elements come out to play?

So how do we address this? What is the solution?

The heads of those media organisations must push for greater space. Gone are the days when certain topics are off-limits because they are “too sensitive”. If they are not debated and discussed responsibly through the mainstream media then they will be debated online where moderation and responsible discussion may be forgotten.

It is high time that the Malaysian media step up to the plate and play their part in transforming Malaysia into a true democracy.


(Visited 392 times, 1 visits today)

Tags: , , ,

Posts by

Umran Kadir is a lawyer who now lives in the UK.

Posted on 5 January 2010. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.

Read more articles posted by .

Read this first: LB Terms of Use

5 Responses to Malaysia: All Real Estate, No Fourth Estate

  1. Real Estate

    I benefit so lots enjoy from this internet site. I besides bookmark it for anew know-how. I uniform this endorse. I experience the prominent weblog you benefit.

  2. The people are left with two starkly contrasting choices: blogs and other online media which taken as a whole are often perceived as anti-government and the mainstream media which handles the government with kid gloves and is by default and by reason of ownership seen as the mouthpieces of the government.

  3. Shah Alpine Price

    This blog is really valuable. In this blog given all information is about real estate in Malaysia. All information is very informative and useful. All information sure increases my knowledge. Thank you for sharing such nice information.

  4. Umran

    It would be simplistic and far fetched for anyone to believe that change of the nature and magnitude I describe would be possible overnight. However, editors are in a unique position to widen the sphere for public discussion and can do so without necessarily jeapordising their careers. My experience with some editors in the MSM has been encouraging, and with others much less so.

    But how does one address this divergence in attitudes amongst editors and the MSM as a whole?

    If our approach is going to be one of making excuses for unacceptable behaviour then why should we stop at the MSM? Should corruption amongst the police be condoned because the salary of the average policeman remains low? Should the racist or extremist rhetoric of politicians be excused because they are merely playing to the gallery?

    Perhaps your attitude is borne of frustration. If so, then I too must confess my own frustration with the state and direction of our country which stems from the steadfast belief that Malaysia is not being allowed to fulfill its amazing potential.

    To make Malaysia a better place we must stop making excuses for those who exhibit unacceptable behaviour. Instead, we must demand better from those in positions of power and influence – just imagine the possibilities if enough of us did this.

  5. First all the MSM are gomen apple polishers.

    Second they only take orders from the gomen.

    Third they will not risk losing their licence

    because of certain gomen Acts that hang over

    their necks.

    So how in the world could you suggest that the

    editors of MSM to step onto the plate when they

    don't have the balls to do so?

    Look at the MSM in Thailand and Indonesia. They

    have true Press freedom unlike so-called democratic

    Malaysia.