Is the definition of a “Muslim” unconstitutional?
The #Zaina Abdin constitutional reference on religious freedom being heard by the Federal Court
The #Zaina Abdin constitutional reference on religious freedom being heard by the Federal Court
Two lawyers disputed common political claims that Malaysia is an Islamic state.
An exciting forum this Tuesday 16 August, 8pm.
This week, His Supreme Eminenceness regales readers about the presumption of innocence, and how you too can be a Jedi.
John Ling remembers the people whom Malaysia has forgotten
“Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself.” — George Carlin
I have seen firsthand what “dialogue” means to some – you do not talk, you only talk on our terms, you listen to us and don’t talk, and if you are allowed to talk, you can only say what we want to hear.
However, while the non-Muslim does not have to seek prior approval to organize talks or seminars with regards to his religion, the Muslim citizen appears to have this added hurdle to cross in order to exercise his rights under Article 10 and Article 11 (1). Is this constitutional? Is this legal? I will not ask the question if this hurdle is consistent with the Quran since it is not (my humble view – stand to be corrected). – www.LoyarBurok.com
A thought about Article 11(2) of the Federal Constitution
Loading ...