Federal Confusion: 137 Yes/No/Yes/No?
Apex Federal Court decisions are perpetuating the 137 confusion.
Apex Federal Court decisions are perpetuating the 137 confusion.
Zharif Badrul menganalisa keputusan penghakiman kes UKM4 oleh Mahkamah Tinggi.

Satu lagi keputusan Mahkamah yang menafsirkan Perlembagaan Negeri menyebelahi pihak Barisan Nasional.

A critical commentary about the Federal Court decision of Kerajaan Malaysia v Lay Kee Tee [2009] 1 MLJ 1 concerning its interpretation of section 5 and 6 of the Government Proceeding Act 1956 and its impact on vicarious liability claims against the Government.
A short discussion and introduction to the Federal Court decision of Zaitun Marketing Sdn Bhd v Boustead Eldred Sdn Bhd (Federal Court Civil Appeal No. W – 02 – 47 – 2008). Coram: Tun Zaki bin Azmi CJ, Tan Sri Dato’ Alauddin bin Dato’ Mohd Sheriff PCA, Dato’ Gopal Sri Ram FCJ. The written judgments of Tun Azmi bin Azmi CJ and Dato’ Gopal Sri Ram FCJ are downloadable.
With reference to the 3 questions for the Federal Court on the MB v MB appeal mentioned here, my answers are as below:
Date: July 9, 2009 Coram: Alauddin Sheriff, Arifin Zakaria, Zulkefli Makinudin FCJJ
LoyarBurok is privileged to have received this comment piece from Kevin YL Tan on the on-going Perak constitutional crisis. Kevin has taught constitutional law for over 20 years. He currently holds Adjunct Professorships at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore and the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. He is [...]
Professor Dr. Andrew Harding, after the demise of the late Professor RH Hickling CMG QC, would (with Professor Dr. HP Lee) arguably share the honour of being the foremost jurists on the Malaysian Constitution. Among others, he is the author of “Public Duties and Public Law” (OUP, 1989), “Law, Government and the Constitution in Malaysia” [...]