A cogitation on the politicization of Islam in the country – what spurned its coming to being, it’s manifestation and how it is adversely affecting Malaysia and her citizens, in particular the ordinary Muslim citizen – in 4 parts.
A cogitation on the politicization of Islam in the country – what spurned its coming to being, it’s manifestation and how it is adversely affecting Malaysia and her citizens, in particular the ordinary Muslim citizen – in 4 parts.
A cogitation on the politicization of Islam in the country – what spurned its coming to being, it’s manifestation and how it is adversely affecting Malaysia and her citizens, in particular the ordinary Muslim citizen – in 4 parts.
Satu pihak melaungkan perkara 153 sebagai “hak Melayu” yang “tidak boleh dicabar”; pihak yang lain pula menuduh perkara 153 sebagai “tongkat Melayu” seolah-olah ia sesuatu yang harus dimalukan. Kedua-dua pendirian sedemikian tidak membantu ke arah memahami Perkara 153 mahupun ke arah melaksanakannya dengan cara yang menguntungkan Negara.
However, while the non-Muslim does not have to seek prior approval to organize talks or seminars with regards to his religion, the Muslim citizen appears to have this added hurdle to cross in order to exercise his rights under Article 10 and Article 11 (1). Is this constitutional? Is this legal? I will not ask the question if this hurdle is consistent with the Quran since it is not (my humble view – stand to be corrected). – www.LoyarBurok.com