In Defence of Seksualiti Merdeka
To ban something, there must be a tangible harm to others, not an illusory harm!
To ban something, there must be a tangible harm to others, not an illusory harm!
Batu 5 ponders on our nation state, and sets July 9 as Malaysia’s litmus test.
This is the tale of that act of cowardice and the reasons why I did it. I want readers to assume THE position: our position as students in a local public university – the fears we face and the oppression that we have to endure daily.
For quite obvious reasons, “Batu 5″ as a law student in a local university must write using a pseudonym for fear of the UUCA. Ironically, putting on his debating hat, he tries to justify UUCA’s from the Government’s perspective.
LoyarBurok is publishing this 3-part article we received from a law student at a local university who prefers to be known as “Batu 5″. Part 3 poses the hard questions Malaysia needs to answer to move forward.
LoyarBurok is publishing this 3-part article we received from a law student at a local university who prefers to be known as “Batu 5.” Part 2 takes an incisive look at whether the NEP has achieved its objectives.
LoyarBurok is publishing this 3-part article we received from a law student at a local university who prefers to be known as “Batu 5.” Part 1 looks back on the original intent of Malaysia’s affirmative action policies.
Loading ...