The recent action by the Immigration Department revoking the passports of Alvin Tan and Ali Abdul Jalil has generated an interesting discussion on whether the relevant authorities have power under the law to take this action. This raises the related question of whether citizens of Malaysia have a “right to a passport” or even a “right to travel abroad”. This discussion involves two important cases decided by the Federal Court: Lee Kwan Woh v Public Prosecutor [2009] 5 MLJ 301 and Loh Wai Kong v Government of Malaysia [1978] 2 MLJ 175, the latter being a unanimous decision of a Federal Court coram including Suffian LP and the late Raja Azlan Shah FCJ (as His Royal Highness then was).

Recent media reports appear to have focused on Lee Kwan Woh as supposedly having decided that the Immigration Department lacks the legal authority to take this action. In fact, the position is not so clear. Directly contradicting the earlier finding of the unanimous Federal Court in Loh Wai Kong, Gopal Sri Ram FCJ ruled in Lee Kwan Woh is that the constitutional right to “personal liberty” guaranteed under Article 5(1) includes “the right to travel abroad” (para 14). There is however no authority cited for this proposition other than the dicta of the learned High Court judge, Gunn Chit Tuan J in Loh Wai Kong, which was subsequently overruled specifically on that point by the Federal Court. English case law also does not support this proposition, as the grant of passports there is a discretionary exercise of the Royal Prerogative. Although this exercise of discretion is reviewable by the courts on ordinary administrative law principles, there is no such thing as an entitlement to a passport as of right; see for eg. R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Everett [1989] QB 81, and the British Government’s statement here.

Much also seems to have been made of Gopal Sri Ram FCJ calling (at para 7 of Lee Kwan Woh) the earlier Federal Court decision “worthless as precedent”. This somewhat curiously damning proclamation of an earlier apex court decision appears to be founded solely on His Lordship’s view that the Federal Court should not have entertained the appeal by the Government in Loh Wai Kong. With all due respect, this itself is a controversial claim and only one pre-Merdeka UK Court of Appeal case – Lake v Lake [1955] P 336 – is cited as authority. On the facts of Loh Wai Kong, nothing in the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 or the Federal Constitution provisions on the appellate courts appears to support this view.

Furthermore, the remarks on the right to a passport in Lee Kwan Woh are clearly obiter dicta as that case was not about the right to travel abroad in the first place and the Court was elaborating on what it took to be the full “prismatic” interpretation of Article 5(1), whereas in Loh Wai Kong it was the central issue at stake and therefore the Court’s decision constitutes ratio decidendi.

I do not intend this to be a comment on the propriety or otherwise of the decisions to revoke passports in Alvin Tan and Ali Abdul Jalil’s specific case, but readers of comments in the media should be careful not to be misled into thinking that the Constitution gives more ‘rights’ or entitlements than it actually does. It is also worth noting that the grant and revocation of passports, as an exercise of prerogative power, is an entirely distinct issue from that of citizenship and the right of citizens not to be banished from the Federation under Article 9(1) of the Constitution.

Reference:

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/right-to-travel-abroad-cannot-be-taken-away-says-2009-federal-court-ruling

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/immigration-has-no-power-to-revoke-passports-say-lawyers

 

 

 

Wilson is currently a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, working in the area of Malaysian constitutional law. Previously, he taught constitutional and administrative...

17 replies on “Is There A Constitutional Right To Travel Abroad?”

  1. Pleasantly introduced data in this enter, I demonstrate this assortment of compel. The prudence of importance is satisfying likewise the settlement is salubrious.

  2. Umrah visas are issued each year from the beginning of the month of Safar to the beginning of the month of Ramadan. Your mother must travel with a Mahram, unless she is over the age of forty-five

  3. I studied in Dublin, Ireland two years back (turned 20 years old in Dublin; Study Abroad while at Indiana University). It was the best experience of my life. In addition I backpacked by my self through Europe, which proved an even better experience. What is exciting is who you meet. I have life-long friends from Columbia, Australia, the Netherlands, etc.

  4. each time traveling in another country, one will most likely always take in consideration good and low-priced international traveling cover. Travel insurances have grown essential as soon as vacationing. Many vacation companies and insurers have coincided in order to make sure they give the customers when using the superb service they sincerely deserve. http://www.travelingsenecatrail.org

  5. When a successful replacement becomes necessary by entrepreneurs for small enterprise finance services previously by banks, there are various business finance choices to take into consideration. An more and more prudent alternative is made for small companies to get whether you'll discover effective manufacturing finance options to vary bank finance before they’re basically required mainly because industrial borrowers is likely to hear various reports about the growing issues in having loans from banks. http://www.dehchotravel.org

  6. When a successful replacement becomes necessary by entrepreneurs for small enterprise finance services previously by banks, there are various business finance choices to take into consideration. An more and more prudent alternative is made for small companies to get whether you'll discover effective manufacturing finance options to vary bank finance before they’re basically required mainly because industrial borrowers is likely to hear various reports about the growing issues in having loans from banks. http://www.hawaiifamilyfinance.org

  7. In the event you’re contemplating buying the latest vehicle, you will be confused together with frustrated when facing deciding concerning a manufacturer’s reimburse and 0% finance. Despite that 0% finance seems far more desirable versus actual ex-, there isn’t almost any denying the exact tremendous selling point of using this manufacturer’s rebate such as a down payment jointly with a low-interest rate car loan package from your neighborhood bank or perhaps credit marital life. http://www.mindanaomicrofinance.org

  8. Some sort of 20 year term life insurance plan delivers comprehensive coverage to your insurer by pre-fixed selling price. This is performed for stipulated timeframe. Once your message period of two full decades expires, coverage in the previous rate-of-premiums seems to lose its reassure. http://www.lifeinsuranceadvisors.org

  9. Tours and travels are best transportation based it contains the well peoples really generates well, traveling makings. The best tours and travels needs the conducts the natural trips keep it up.

  10. This brings up the related issue of whether residents of nation have a privilege to an identification or even a privilege to travel abroad. This discourse includes two imperative cases chose by the government court.

  11. That's all well and good.

    However, when a genocidal thug by the name of Najib, Khairy or Hishammuddin points a gun at your head and insists the sky is yellow as opposed to blue, you'd have to nod and agree with him, wouldn't you?

    Sadly, that's how it is in Malaysia these days.

Comments are closed.