Comments on: LGBT trapped! http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/ Sun, 19 May 2013 05:33:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=373 By: nobody http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/comment-page-1/#comment-303614 nobody Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:36:59 +0000 http://www.loyarburok.com/?p=44222#comment-303614 because malaysia is governed by stupid racist malays. because malaysia is governed by stupid racist malays.

]]> By: fareezkamal http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/comment-page-1/#comment-260269 fareezkamal Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:58:09 +0000 http://www.loyarburok.com/?p=44222#comment-260269 I am a Malaysian, and I'm agree that from the perspective of? human rights and social justice, your views are very accurate and can't be disputed. However, please not be mistaken, Malaysia government have never oppress LGBTs, but we try to save them. In the name of Islam and Malaysia as a Muslim country, this is our responsible to fought all LGBT, pluralism, and liberalism influence, and it’s compulsory to do so as they are against Islam and Quran. I am a Malaysian, and I'm agree that from the perspective of? human rights and social justice, your views are very accurate and can't be disputed. However, please not be mistaken, Malaysia government have never oppress LGBTs, but we try to save them. In the name of Islam and Malaysia as a Muslim country, this is our responsible to fought all LGBT, pluralism, and liberalism influence, and it’s compulsory to do so as they are against Islam and Quran.

]]> By: anon http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/comment-page-1/#comment-260177 anon Fri, 03 Aug 2012 04:01:54 +0000 http://www.loyarburok.com/?p=44222#comment-260177 this is sickening. this is sickening.

]]> By: TJay http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/comment-page-1/#comment-259988 TJay Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:42:52 +0000 http://www.loyarburok.com/?p=44222#comment-259988 Actually, no, the definition of marriage has never always been ONE man ONE woman-- polygamy was common, and in fact the groom is considered by many as a stud if he has 4 wives. Also, I believe marriage used to be for life-- meaning even if your husband is an abusive alcoholic good-for-nothing bank- (or I suppose, back in the days, cave-) robber, you have to stay with him. So, the way I see it, the definition of marriage has changed, mostly to reflect societal changes. Actually, no, the definition of marriage has never always been ONE man ONE woman– polygamy was common, and in fact the groom is considered by many as a stud if he has 4 wives. Also, I believe marriage used to be for life– meaning even if your husband is an abusive alcoholic good-for-nothing bank- (or I suppose, back in the days, cave-) robber, you have to stay with him.

So, the way I see it, the definition of marriage has changed, mostly to reflect societal changes.

]]> By: Clarence http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/comment-page-1/#comment-259781 Clarence Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:43:27 +0000 http://www.loyarburok.com/?p=44222#comment-259781 I do agree to the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in our constitution as part of our diversity, however same-sex marriage is a totally different argument, as the conceptualization of marriage in itself is flawed and needed much reviewed, looking at the driver of marriage institutions as well as other related sectors. An inclusion of SOGi should not fight for heteronormative arrangement like marriage, it should cover more crucial element that criss-cross in all areas, like discrimination and stigma. I do agree to the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in our constitution as part of our diversity, however same-sex marriage is a totally different argument, as the conceptualization of marriage in itself is flawed and needed much reviewed, looking at the driver of marriage institutions as well as other related sectors. An inclusion of SOGi should not fight for heteronormative arrangement like marriage, it should cover more crucial element that criss-cross in all areas, like discrimination and stigma.

]]> By: Adam http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/comment-page-1/#comment-259730 Adam Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:36:32 +0000 http://www.loyarburok.com/?p=44222#comment-259730 Although I am not against LGBTs' right to live their lives as they wish, I personally feel that they should not call their union a marriage as from time immemorial, a marriage is between a man and a woman. What I would suggest is for same sex unions to be drawn up as contracts between 2 or more individuals with agreeable terms and conditions. I believe this would be acceptable to most folks. Although I am not against LGBTs' right to live their lives as they wish, I personally feel that they should not call their union a marriage as from time immemorial, a marriage is between a man and a woman. What I would suggest is for same sex unions to be drawn up as contracts between 2 or more individuals with agreeable terms and conditions.
I believe this would be acceptable to most folks.

]]> By: pepperlim http://www.loyarburok.com/2012/07/19/lgbt-trapped/comment-page-1/#comment-259729 pepperlim Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:34:00 +0000 http://www.loyarburok.com/?p=44222#comment-259729 Nice! Nice!

]]>